WORKING MAN’S DONUT

September 26th, 2006

Of donuts, Ben McGrath says, “no food sneers so winningly at pretension.” McGrath also says, in a recent New Yorker article, that during the 2004 Presidential campaign, Al Sharpton criticized Bush for making a donut speech: “a lot of sugar and syrup on the outside, and nothing but a hole in the middle.”

May DONUT DAYS live up to its namesake and sneer at pretension. Yet may it have more substance than a Bush speech which, no offense to conservatives, isn’t hard. I have decided, indeed, to pursue the book, to write it to the best of my ability, and to see what happens.

Party on, donut. Party on.

TRUTH, DARE, DOUBLE-DARE, PROMISE OR REPEAT

September 25th, 2006

I’ll take truth. And here it is.

The truth is that writing a good YA book is damn hard. And now I’m on to writing DONUT DAYS, I wonder if I should really be writing again at all. Because what if I’m just repeating the same mistakes I made with TD in a different context? What if DONUT DAYS is just going to get me into the same rut I’m into now? With agents that say, “thanks, great writing, but it’s not for us.” Not that rejections in and of themselves are bad. They’re part of the game, I know. It’s just …well, is DONUT DAYS going to get me any more published than TD? The books feel really similar; the main characters feel like they could be swapped for one another. Which makes me wonder if I should scrap it and start something different. I have a different book in my head … but the idea of writing it is a little overwhelming right now. Maybe I just need to get over myself and try it.

Writing a good YA book is damn hard.

And writing two is even harder.

FORGIVENESS AT MASS (MARKET)

September 21st, 2006

Yesterday I wrote to a fantastic editor, Steve Meltzer, at Dutton, who I had gotten in touch with through Brad Meltzer (yes, Meltzer and Meltzer, though they’re not related). Anyway, Steve had read an early, early version of THE DISAPPEARED and I asked if he’d want to see how far it had come. Like I did with Kristin, I pasted the first chapter into the email as evidence of this.

Steve said he dug how the book had changed, but that it wasn’t right for Dutton. And he gave me an interesting reason as to why. His exact words: “This book has more of a feel of a mass market original. I think that is the way to go.”

And I was like, huh? Mass market original? I totally didn’t get it, or why a mass market original wouldn’t fit with Dutton’s books. I looked up “mass market book” then “mass market paperback” online and found a link through answers.com. What I can gather is that mass market paperbacks or trade paperbacks are soft-cover books that get really wide distribution – bookstores, airports, etc. Like a soft-cover John Grisham or a straight-to-paperback romance. Why wouldn’t Dutton want that? Because they’re in the business of publishing books like MY SIDE OF THE MOUNTAIN, which will garner awards, even while they might not have appeal across such a wide audience. And hey, as much as I’m proud of THE DISAPPEARED, I also realize it’s not Newberry material.

If anyone has any insights about mass market originals or if anyone can give further insight into this situation, I’d love to hear from you.

BAD NEWS BEARS

September 20th, 2006

Okay. Kristin passed on THE DISAPPEARED. There it is. I still love her. She totally rules. But she passed.

Here’s the part in the story where the camera pans to the writer walking down a deserted street. An empty bag of some sort skirts by while dead leaves swirl and Coldplay sounds in the background.

All the movements you’re starting to make
See me crumble and fall on my face
And I know the mistakes that I made
See it all disappear without a trace

All these rejections just make me stronger, right? Well, maybe. Maybe not. Because here’s the big scary black fear that hulks underneath my bed at night waiting to eat me: That I won’t make it as a writer. And then what? Then I’m stuck at my day job Stepfordizing my way through each day. Not writing.

Not good.

Anyone else out there know the feeling?

HOUSE OF PEN AND BLOG

September 19th, 2006

I’m totally psyched! Dan Lazar asked to see the first 50 pages of THE DISAPPEARED. His agency, Writers House, is seriously kick ass. I mean, they represent Erica Jong, Ken Follett, and on the teen fiction side, Christopher Paolini. Word! Okay, and they did CHOOSE YOUR OWN ADVENTURE. Suh-weet. Is it ironic that I referenced that series in my letter to Kristin Nelson, a different agent?

HE SAID, SHE SAID

September 18th, 2006

J. Robert Lennon once said that if you really want to know how to write convincing dialogue, you should set up shop at a coffee shop, or diner, or other locale and write down exactly what people say, exactly how they say it. That technique alone, he said, will help a writer generate more convincing dialogue.

THE DISAPPEARED needed dialogue help, as my helpful and honest friend Colleen pointed out to me (see post about how important it is to have people review your work). She said the dialogue was often the same for everyone – that it wasn’t always clear that different people were speaking.

Case in point is a scene between Paige and her boyfriend, Philip. He shows up on her doorstep after dissing her. In a nutshell, he’s supposed to be selfish and aloof, but still wants to get laid. She’s trying to figure out what’s going on. Here’s the first version:

“You look amazing,” he said.
“You look … tired,” I said, feeling too raw to be dishonest.
“I know,” he sighed, leaning in toward me. “I know.”

After Colleen’s input, here are the revisions:

“You look hot,” he said.
“You look … tired,” I said, feeling too raw to be dishonest.
“Heh,” he half-laughed, “I know.”

These subtle changes make Philip seem so much younger. They also better convey a bit of his shallow personality. And it seems like two different people are talking. I’m not saying it’s perfect, but I am saying it’s better.

Good dialogue is hard. I found this little tutorial online by Robert J. Sawyer and liked it. So I’m sharing it.

LIGHTS, CAMERA, ACTION

September 12th, 2006

So, every writer wants their book made into a movie, right? Maybe not. I thought the below article was interesting about local (Ann Arbor, Michigan) folk who had their books optioned for movies. It doesn’t always wrap up with a fairy tale ending, as you’ll read in the text.J. Robert Lennon had his book, Mailman, optioned for book rights and at one time heard the name of a big Hollywood actor associated with it. That was in 2004 when I met him for the first time at the Bear River writers conference, which was a fantastic experience. I recommend it for any writer. Anyway, there’s been crickets on Lennon’s movie deal since, though who knows. According to the article, these things can take years.

Lights, camera, action … or maybe not
Local authors wait for films to be made based on their books

ANN ARBOR NEWS
Sunday, September 10, 2006

BY MARIANNE RZEPKA
News Staff Reporter

Bob Wilson, a Northville attorney and writer, sold the options on his book, “Crooked Tree,” when it first came out.

In fact, he says, “I sold it three times.”

Wilson even wrote a screenplay, but still no movie has been seen.

Writers are happy enough to get their work published, but it can be the icing on the cake when Hollywood buys the rights to make a book into a movie. And Wilson’s not the only area author to have sold his book rights.

Locally, at least three writers have current contracts to turn their printed words into cinema. In one case, cameras are rolling now on a film being made from a book by Chelsea author Laura Kasischke.

However, just selling the options doesn’t mean a movie will follow.

Mary Bisbee-Beek, trade marketing manager at the University of Michigan Press, set up a movie deal for another writer, W.D. Wetherell, after his book “A Century of November,” published by the U-M Press, got a rave review in Entertainment Weekly.

Wetherell was a bit “cavalier” about the whole thing, says Bisbee-Beek. “He told me ‘I had a book that was optioned for 14 years,”’ she says.

To be made into a movie, the project has to have a wonderful screenplay, a first-rate director and name actors, says Simon Lipskar, of the New York firm Writers House.

“And it has to convince a movie studio that it will make money on it – that they will make money on top of the 10 to 50 to 100 to $150 million it takes to make the movie,” the agent says.

Even if a movie is made, says Lipskar, it’s not always a win-win situation.

“Authors who get movies made are both cursed and lucky,” he says.

“Cursed because they must live with the movie’s creations (of their characters) forever. Lucky because they’ve probably been paid very well, in many cases, more than they’ve been paid for their books.”

Usually, an author will sell the book option for a set amount and for a set period of time. The author gets more money if the movie is made.

Lipskar says options for book rights can run from $5,000 and up.

Of that, the agent who arranged the deal usually gets a standard 15 percent fee, he says.

There are no figures on how many optioned books are made into movies, says Lipskar. “It’s not Las Vegas,” he says. “It’s hard to put odds down.”

Kasischke has beaten whatever the odds are.

A film of her book “The Life Before Her Eyes” is being filmed in Connecticut now. Retitled “In Bloom,” it stars Uma Thurman and Pierce Brosnan. The director is Vadim Perelman who previously directed “House of Sand and Fog.”

The book was published in 2001 and the movie options sold soon afterward, says Kasischke.
She heard nothing for years. Then, in May, Kasischke – who teaches at U-M – received a message that Thurman had agreed to be in the film.

It’s not the first time one of her books was optioned for a film. Her first novel, “Suspicious River,” was turned into a film by a small independent producer in Canada.

But that was a little-seen movie, without the star power of the upcoming film.

Kasischke declines to discuss dollar amounts, but she says that the money paid when a movie is made is “about 200 times” whatever is paid for the options.

Kasischke, who has written six books of poetry, has produced four novels and sold the options on all of them, including one, titled “Be Mine,” due out in January.

Local author Elizabeth Kostova could be close to seeing her best-selling book, “The Historian,” made into a movie.

Producer Douglas Wick is lined up to make the film; he’s also done “Memoirs of a Geisha,” “Girl Interrupted” and “Gladiator.”

Still, it’s not clear when her book will be shown on the big screen. After all, it took seven years for “Memoirs of a Geisha” to be shot, says Kostova, who teaches at the University of Michigan’s creative writing program.

She won’t say how much Hollywood money she will get. However, she explains that Sony paid for the rights to the book for two years, and there will be more coming to her when the movie is made. Her contract also stipulates that she will get a bonus amount if the book becomes a bestseller and if the movie makes a certain amount of money.

“This gives studios a lot of flexibility,” Kostova says, since they don’t have to pay a lot of money if the movie isn’t made or isn’t as popular as they had hoped.

Publishers Weekly, Variety and other publications have reported film rights to “The Historian” sold for $1.5 million to $1.75 million.

But Kostova cautions that she’s not going to see all that money. Her two agents will get their cuts, and another 60 percent will go in taxes and commissions.

Some authors, like Ann Arbor writer Steve Gillis, turn down movie option deals.

Gillis, who founded the 826 Michigan program for young writers, had an offer for his book, “Walter Falls,” but passed on the $20,000 option when he realized the producer wanted to turn the novel into a mystery, “which it isn’t,” he says.

“I didn’t want to get caught up in the whole process, and I felt I was selling my soul to the devil,” says Gillis. “My agent nearly killed me.”

Ann Arbor’s Steve Amick also said “no” to a deal, just before he said “yes” to another for rights to his book “The Lake, the River and the Other Lake: A Novel.”

The title was shopped around for about a year. But the only offer was for a television series, a la “Northern Exposure,” he says.

Amick passed, worried that the show “could have gone on forever as something horrible.”

Then, out of the blue, he got a call from his Los Angeles agent who told him that someone was interested in the book. That someone was Gary David Goldberg, of Ubu Productions, who produced, directed and adapted the movie “Must Love Dogs,” and has credits going back to creating and producing television shows, such as “Family Ties” and “Spin City.”

Amick is philosophical about what happens to the deal.

“What becomes of it is what becomes of it,” he says. “I’m sure there will be things I hate if it does go all the way, but ultimately, it brings more readers to the book.”

Marianne Rzepka can be reached at 734-994-6820 or mrzepka@annarbornews.com.

GIRL FROM IMPANEMA

September 11th, 2006

The waiting game is hard. I’m currently shifting from one foot to another in the elevator, whistling “The Girl from Impanema,” trying to stay calm. Metaphorically, that is. But really, I’m freaking out all over the place wondering if my queries (all seven of them) have landed in the right places and if they’re piquing the interest of any editors. And no, my query numbers don’t count the one rejection I just got from the Knight Agency and my re-query to Kristin.

One of the ways in which my friend Colleen suggested I improve THE DISAPPEARED was by including more pop culture references — things teens would know about and connect with. I had a few, but here is a partial list of the things I added:

Red Bull
IMs
Text messaging
The Dog Whisperer
Entourage
Ashlee Simpson
iMac
iPod

The drawback to doing this is that it can date the book. 20 years from now people will be like, ha, the Dog Whisperer. But Colleen’s point stands. I might want to write about REM and Madonna, but kids won’t get it. And that defeats the potential success of the book.

THE REVIEWS ARE IN … SORT OF

September 9th, 2006

THE DISAPPEARED is a solid book in part because I’ve worked hard and haven’t given up on it. But the other reason it doesn’t totally and completely blow chunks is because I’ve had amazing reviewers along the way. My bestest writer friend, Ellen, read the book like three times and got it to higher ground with endless supportive critiques. Her input, early on, when the book was 20 pages old, was critical. And my good fried Colleen also read it and picked up on things like cliché dialogue, character flaws, and plot potholes.I benefited so greatly from outside critique and input – I can’t imagine a writer producing a successful book without it. Maybe Truman Capote or something. But I’d be stymied in a publishing quagmire without good friends that I trusted with my text, and their exceptional perspectives.

THE COMPLETE IDIOT’S GUIDE TO GETTING PUBLISHED has great tips for getting outside perspective on your manuscript. If you don’t want to buy the whole book, some of the tips are online and can be viewed as a PDF for free.

For what it’s worth, I bought the book when I was working on my nonfiction book for teens, MAKE THINGS HAPPEN: THE KEY TO NETWORKING FOR TEENS. It totally helped get me published.

REPLY IN THE SKY

September 6th, 2006

Dude, Kristin wrote back! She’s willing to reconsider THE DISAPPEARED. I am psyched. Totally. Psyched.

Even if she rejects it again, I’ll chalk this up as a huuuge learning experience. Why? Because I made a big mistake the first time around when I queried her.

Back when I sent her the book in August, I thought it was awesome, ready to roll, a finished product, and it wasn’t. There was some heavy lifting left to do with it, and I shirked it off, thinking my book was fa-bu-lous and any agent was a fool not to see it.

That wasn’t the case. And it was a tough lesson to learn. I’ve made a pact with myself, and my bestest writing friend Ellen Baker (author of the forthcoming book KEEPING THE HOUSE published by, you guessed it, Random House) that I will never send out a book again until it’s gone through three (count ‘em, three) major rewrites. That’s a lot, but it’s so worth it.

It’s definitely humbling to sit here and blog about such submission blunders. Or to admit that I thought my book was totally fab when it wasn’t. I guess that’s all part of the learning process. Open mouth. Insert crow.

Ellen recommended a book – and I second her recommendation! – that helped take TD to the next level. It’s called THE PLOT THICKENS: 8 WAYS TO BRING FICTION TO LIFE and the author is Noah Lukeman. Here’s a link.

Oh, and for anyone who’s interested, here’s my second email to Kristin, asking her to reconsider TD:

Dear Kristin,

Thank you for your response to THE DISAPPEARED. I appreciate your willingness to consider the work and, even though it was rejected, I very much respect your opinion and your choice.

There was a note on your blog a few weeks back about receiving manuscripts with great plots, but flat characters and cliché dialogue. You bet that got me thinking about TD. I also realized that after receiving your rejection, I had two paths I could follow, like in the Choose Your Own Adventure series, where one choice leads to deadly scorpions and the other leads out of the dark cave. I chose the latter and considered why TD wasn’t working. I also set out to improve it.

I’m writing you again because I realized I had a great book concept but a main character who wasn’t accessible to readers; I had a kick-butt plot, but little character growth to keep people reading. I had a lot that was right, but a lot that was wrong, too. I have been working on these issues and I’d like to showcase just how much the book has changed for the better, and to ask if you would be willing to read the improved prologue and first chapter, pasted below, as evidence of this. If these words don’t grab you and make you want to read more, fair enough. But I had to ask again. It’s a long, long, long shot but then again so was the notion that Nick and Jessica would stay together, Paris’s album would rock, and the Duff sisters would make blockbuster summer movie. Oh wait … um, well, at least Frodo make it to the top of the mountain, right? Here’s the text, and thank you for the continued consideration.